WhichPepsPeptides. Without the hype.
Review / evidence synthesis ยท NAD+

NAD+ supplementation for anti-aging and wellness: PRISMA-guided systematic review

Oral NR/NMN usually showed biochemical target engagement, but clinically meaningful outcomes were heterogeneous; no eligible IV/IM NAD+ outcome trial for anti-ageing/wellness was identified.

Quick read
Review / evidence synthesis

What this study tells us

This study reviewed or combined evidence from multiple studies. It can show the overall direction of a field, but its conclusion still depends on the quality and relevance of the studies it included.

Who was studied?

Human and rodent intervention literature

How many?

n=113 studies (33 human; 80 rodent)

What happened?

Oral NR/NMN usually showed biochemical target engagement, but clinically meaningful outcomes were heterogeneous; no eligible IV/IM NAD+ outcome trial for anti-ageing/wellness was identified.

What stops us overclaiming?

Different NAD-related molecules and routes cannot be treated as interchangeable.

Need help with terms such as randomized, placebo, endpoint or sample size? Open the glossary โ†’

Key result

Oral NR/NMN usually showed biochemical target engagement, but clinically meaningful outcomes were heterogeneous; no eligible IV/IM NAD+ outcome trial for anti-ageing/wellness was identified.

Study details

Study designSystematic review
PopulationHuman and rodent intervention literature
Sample size113 studies (33 human; 80 rodent)
RouteMixed
Regimen / exposureNR, NMN, NAD+ and related interventions across included studies
DurationStudies through Oct 2025
ComparatorVaried
Primary endpoint / questionClinical evidence for NAD-related anti-ageing/wellness interventions
Safety resultSafety varied by intervention; direct parenteral NAD+ outcome evidence was too sparse for a robust benefit-risk conclusion.
Key limitationsDifferent NAD-related molecules and routes cannot be treated as interchangeable.
Registry / identifierPMID 41655607