WhichPepsPeptides. Without the hype.
Human evidence record ยท Cagrilintide

Once-weekly cagrilintide Phase II weight-management trial

Mean weight reductions ranged 6.0%-10.8% across cagrilintide doses versus 3.0% placebo; 4.5 mg produced 10.8% versus 9.0% with liraglutide.

Quick read
Human evidence record

What this study tells us

Participants were assigned to comparison groups by chance, usually with placebo and/or blinding to reduce bias. This is a strong design for testing cause and effect, but the population, duration and endpoints still limit what can be concluded.

Who was studied?

Adults with overweight/obesity without diabetes

How many?

n=706

What happened?

Mean weight reductions ranged 6.0%-10.8% across cagrilintide doses versus 3.0% placebo; 4.5 mg produced 10.8% versus 9.0% with liraglutide.

What stops us overclaiming?

Phase II; not the same evidence level as an approved weight-management medicine and not evidence for unregulated products.

Need help with terms such as randomized, placebo, endpoint or sample size? Open the glossary โ†’

Key result

Mean weight reductions ranged 6.0%-10.8% across cagrilintide doses versus 3.0% placebo; 4.5 mg produced 10.8% versus 9.0% with liraglutide.

Study details

Study designRandomized double-blind placebo- and active-controlled dose-ranging trial
PhasePhase II
PopulationAdults with overweight/obesity without diabetes
Sample size706
RouteSubcutaneous
Regimen / exposure0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 2.4 or 4.5 mg once weekly
Duration26 weeks
ComparatorPlacebo and liraglutide 3 mg daily
Primary endpoint / questionPercent body-weight change
Safety resultGI adverse events occurred in 41%-63% versus 32% placebo; nausea 20%-47% versus 18%.
Key limitationsPhase II; not the same evidence level as an approved weight-management medicine and not evidence for unregulated products.
Registry / identifierPMID 34798060 / NCT03856047