WhichPepsPeptides. Without the hype.

Melanotan II

Cyclic melanocortin peptide analogue

Also known as: MT2· community shorthandMelanotan 2· name variant
Pigmentation and sexual…
Generic peptide vial illustrationMelanotan II
Entity typePeptide analogue / modified peptide
Evidence reviewed2026-09-18
Canonical recordMELANOTAN2
Page updated2026-09-20
Evidence profileSmall direct human pharmacology signals; unapproved with major safety uncertainty
Human evidenceLimited
Regulatory statusNot FDA-approved
Choose your depthStart simple, then open the evidence or technical detail only if you need it.
Quick answerPlain languageEvidenceOutcomes and studiesStudiesPrimary recordsTechnicalMechanism, route and identifiers

In plain English

30-second evidence answer

What does the evidence mean in simple terms?

Melanotan II has been administered in small human studies and shows biological activity, but it is not an approved medicine and long-term safety is uncertain. Cosmetic or sexual-use claims go beyond what the limited evidence can establish.

Still uncertain: Long-term cosmetic or sexual-function benefit, long-term safety, safe self-use or an approved regimen.

New to terms such as “preclinical”, “randomized” or “investigational”? Use the plain-English glossary →

What does the evidence mean in simple terms? table
What is it?Cyclic melanocortin peptide analogue
Entity typePeptide analogue / modified peptide
Research focusPigmentation and sexual-function research
Human evidenceVery small human studies demonstrate pigmentation and erectogenic/sexual-desire effects, including placebo-controlled ED studies, but these do not establish routine therapeutic or cosmetic use.
Regulatory statusNot FDA-approved as a tanning medicine; FDA lists significant safety concerns for compounded Melanotan II.
Main limitationsLong-term cosmetic/sexual efficacy, chronic safety, safe self-use or an approved regimen.
SafetyNausea, somnolence, spontaneous erections/priapism and other effects; FDA notes serious case reports including melanoma, PRES and sympathomimetic toxidrome, without implying all are causal.
Evidence reviewed2026-09-18
i
Very small human studies demonstrate pigmentation and erectogenic/sexual-desire effects, including placebo-controlled ED studies, but these do not establish routine therapeutic or cosmetic use.
Outcome-level evidence

Evidence is not one score.

Each record below answers a narrower question about an outcome, population or context. Evidence status and the study finding are shown separately so strong evidence is not mistaken for a positive effect.

How to read this →

Skin pigmentation / tanning

Human evidence
Very low-certainty human evidence

Context: Healthy male pilot exposure

Finding: Pigmentation can occur in humans, but evidence is tiny and does not establish safe cosmetic use.

Uncertainty / evidence gap: No controlled evidence establishes long-term cosmetic benefit-risk or safe chronic tanning use.

Verified 2026-09-18Primary source ↗

Safety of unapproved cosmetic use

Evidence gap
Insufficient human safety evidence

Context: Experimental / non-approved use

Finding: Short-term adverse effects are documented; long-term safety is not established.

Safety / tolerability context: No robust long-term controlled safety programme.

Skin pigmentation / tanning

Human evidence
Very small early human pharmacology

Context: Healthy adults

Finding: Human melanotropic activity is directly demonstrated.

Negative / null finding: No controlled evidence establishes long-term cosmetic benefit-risk or safe chronic tanning use.

Verified 2026-09-18Primary source ↗

Erectile response and sexual desire

Human evidence
Small placebo-controlled human studies

Context: Men with erectile dysfunction

Finding: A direct human erectogenic signal is established.

Safety / tolerability context: The compound is not an approved ED medicine and long-term safety is not established.

Serious safety signals

Regulatory context
Case-report and regulatory safety signal

Context: Non-approved / compounded or illicit exposure

Finding: Serious adverse-event signals exist despite small efficacy studies.

Safety / tolerability context: Case reports do not prove causality for every event.

Verified 2026-09-18Primary source ↗
Evidence rule: an outcome-specific evidence label is not a recommendation, a safety rating or an overall score for the compound.

Evidence synthesis

  • ✓Pigmentation can occur in humans, but evidence is tiny and does not establish safe cosmetic use.
  • ✓Short-term adverse effects are documented; long-term safety is not established.
  • ✓Human melanotropic activity is directly demonstrated.
  • ✓A direct human erectogenic signal is established.
  • ✓Serious adverse-event signals exist despite small efficacy studies.

Important limitations

  • !N=3 and short exposure.
  • !Tiny development programme plus unregulated-market product uncertainty.
  • !N=3, short exposure, early-phase study.
  • !Small studies; acute endpoints; severe nausea occurred in some exposures.
  • !No controlled long-term safety dataset; illicit-product quality is a confounder.

Selected study & evidence records

Pilot Phase I melanotan II human study

1996 · Phase I pilot · n=3

Pigmentation increased in all three volunteers.

Study detail → Primary source ↗

Melanotan II in men with organic erectile dysfunction

2000 · Double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study · n=10

Subjective erections occurred after 12/19 active injections versus 1/21 placebo doses; desire was higher after Melanotan II.

Study detail → Primary source ↗

Safety and unknowns

Nausea, somnolence, spontaneous erections/priapism and other effects; FDA notes serious case reports including melanoma, PRES and sympathomimetic toxidrome, without implying all are causal.

Nausea is common in early studies; FDA summarizes serious case-report signals including melanoma, priapism, sympathomimetic toxidrome and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. Product quality is an additional risk.

Technical details

Mechanism / biologyAgonist at melanocortin receptors, producing melanogenic and other central effects.
Route / formulation boundarySmall research trials do not establish safety of internet-sourced tanning products.
Identity / data-quality noteUse the canonical compound identity and studied formulation when interpreting evidence.
Study / label regimen evidenceVerified study/label regimen evidence is available. Published Phase I human regimen. Open descriptive regimen evidence →
Identifiers & alternate namesMT2 · MT-2 · Melanotan 2 · MT2 TAN

Source depth & provenance

WhichPeps does not rely on a single headline study when the evidence base is broader. Primary research, registries, regulators and supporting records are kept distinct.

2structured study records
5outcome records
7linked source records

How to read these counts: they show evidence coverage, not evidence strength. One large, well-designed study can be more informative than several weak or indirect records.

Show supporting and discovery sources

Study pages above contain the records used for public evidence summaries. The links below include supporting, regulatory and literature-discovery sources; a registry or search result is not treated as proof of benefit.

Evidence rule: WhichPeps keeps human, animal, laboratory, regulatory and product/formulation evidence distinct. Common names help people find the page; they do not change the underlying scientific identity.