WhichPepsPeptides. Without the hype.
Human evidence record ยท Levocarnitine / L-carnitine

L-carnitine supplementation in advanced cancer with carnitine deficiency

The prespecified intent-to-treat analysis found no significant improvement in study endpoints despite increased serum carnitine.

Quick read
Human evidence record

What this study tells us

Participants were assigned to comparison groups by chance, usually with placebo and/or blinding to reduce bias. This is a strong design for testing cause and effect, but the population, duration and endpoints still limit what can be concluded.

Who was studied?

Adults with advanced cancer, carnitine deficiency and moderate-to-severe fatigue

How many?

n=29

What happened?

The prespecified intent-to-treat analysis found no significant improvement in study endpoints despite increased serum carnitine.

What stops us overclaiming?

Small sample; exploratory post-hoc analyses were positive but do not override the negative prespecified analysis.

Need help with terms such as randomized, placebo, endpoint or sample size? Open the glossary โ†’

Key result

The prespecified intent-to-treat analysis found no significant improvement in study endpoints despite increased serum carnitine.

Study details

Study designRandomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study
PopulationAdults with advanced cancer, carnitine deficiency and moderate-to-severe fatigue
Sample size29
RouteOral
Regimen / exposure0.5 g/day for 2 days, 1 g/day for 2 days, then 2 g/day for 10 days
Duration14-day blinded phase
ComparatorPlacebo
Primary endpoint / questionCancer-related fatigue and functional outcomes
Safety resultShort exposure; study primarily informs efficacy rather than long-term safety.
Key limitationsSmall sample; exploratory post-hoc analyses were positive but do not override the negative prespecified analysis.
Registry / identifierPMID 18809275