WhichPepsPeptides. Without the hype.

Sobetirome

Small-molecule thyroid hormone receptor-beta agonist

Also known as: GC-1· development name
Dyslipidaemiametabolic and neurodege…
Generic peptide vial illustrationSobetirome
Entity typeSmall molecule
Evidence reviewed2026-09-18
Canonical recordSOBETIROME
Page updated2026-09-20
Evidence profileHistorical Phase I human exposure; no established clinical efficacy programme / not approved
Human evidencePhase I
Regulatory statusNo FDA/EMA approval identified
Choose your depthStart simple, then open the evidence or technical detail only if you need it.
Quick answerPlain languageEvidenceOutcomes and studiesStudiesPrimary recordsTechnicalMechanism, route and identifiers

In plain English

30-second evidence answer

What does the evidence mean in simple terms?

Sobetirome has historical early human exposure data, but no established modern programme showing clinical benefit or approved treatment role. Weight-loss and other broad metabolic claims therefore remain unproven.

Still uncertain: Weight-loss benefit, long-term cardiovascular or disease outcomes, long-term safety or a current therapeutic regimen.

New to terms such as “preclinical”, “randomized” or “investigational”? Use the plain-English glossary →

What does the evidence mean in simple terms? table
What is it?Small-molecule thyroid hormone receptor-beta agonist
Entity typeSmall molecule
Research focusDyslipidaemia, metabolic and neurodegenerative research
Human evidencePeer-reviewed reviews describe historical Phase I oral exposure with short-term lipid target engagement, including substantial LDL-C reductions, but a fully retrievable primary clinical report remains limited and development did not yield an approved therapy.
Regulatory statusNo FDA/EMA-approved sobetirome medicine identified.
Main limitationsWeight-loss efficacy, long-term cardiovascular/disease outcomes, chronic safety or a current therapeutic regimen.
SafetyThyroid-axis effects and long-term hepatic/cardiovascular/bone safety require clinical definition.
Evidence reviewed2026-09-18
i
Peer-reviewed reviews describe historical Phase I oral exposure with short-term lipid target engagement, including substantial LDL-C reductions, but a fully retrievable primary clinical report remains limited and development did not yield an approved therapy.
Outcome-level evidence

Evidence is not one score.

Each record below answers a narrower question about an outcome, population or context. Evidence status and the study finding are shown separately so strong evidence is not mistaken for a positive effect.

How to read this →

LDL/cholesterol lowering

Human evidence
Early human pharmacology

Context: Early Phase I human exposure

Finding: Human target engagement/lipid signal was observed in early development.

Regulatory / scope context: No modern outcomes trial or approved indication followed.

Weight loss / obesity treatment

Evidence gap
No established clinical efficacy programme

Context: People interested in metabolic weight loss

Finding: Mechanistic plausibility exists.

Uncertainty / evidence gap: No validated human weight-loss outcome established.

Verified 2026-09-18Primary source ↗

Short-term LDL-C lowering

Human evidence
Historical early human evidence reported through peer-reviewed reviews

Context: Early Phase I adult exposure

Finding: There is evidence of short-term lipid target engagement in humans.

Uncertainty / evidence gap: No validated long-term cardiovascular, weight-loss or disease-outcome benefit is established.

Verified 2026-09-18Primary source ↗
Evidence rule: an outcome-specific evidence label is not a recommendation, a safety rating or an overall score for the compound.

Evidence synthesis

  • ✓Human target engagement/lipid signal was observed in early development.
  • ✓Mechanistic plausibility exists.
  • ✓There is evidence of short-term lipid target engagement in humans.

Important limitations

  • !Primary full Phase I publication was not located in this pass; sample/dose details rely partly on development summaries.
  • !Thyromimetic safety/benefit differs fundamentally from incretin therapies.
  • !Primary full Phase I report is not readily retrievable; later development stopped.

Selected study & evidence records

Sobetirome Phase I development summary

2008 · Phase I human development programme summarized in peer-reviewed review · n=24

Peer-reviewed development reviews report Phase I human exposure and LDL-lowering pharmacology, with the programme not progressing to an approved therapy.

Study detail → Primary source ↗

Historical sobetirome Phase I single- and multiple-dose study (reported in peer-reviewed reviews)

2008 · Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled early clinical study as reported in reviews · n=32 single-dose; 24 multiple-dose

Peer-reviewed reviews report LDL-C reductions up to 22% after single-dose exposure and up to 41% after the two-week multiple-dose phase.

Study detail → Primary source ↗

Safety and unknowns

Thyroid-axis effects and long-term hepatic/cardiovascular/bone safety require clinical definition.

Short Phase I exposure cannot establish long-term cardiovascular, skeletal, thyroid-axis or other thyromimetic safety.

Technical details

Mechanism / biologySelective thyroid hormone receptor-beta agonism designed to affect lipid metabolism with fewer TR-alpha-mediated cardiac effects.
Route / formulation boundaryThis is not a peptide and should not be grouped with peptide pharmacology.
Identity / data-quality noteUse the canonical compound identity and studied formulation when interpreting evidence.
Study / label regimen evidenceHistorical Phase I human dosing reported; primary trial publication not located. Historical development records report single rising oral doses and 14-day multiple-dose regimens in healthy men. Present only as Phase I exposure data with source limitations.
Identifiers & alternate namesGC-1 · GC1 · GC - 1 (SOBETIROME)

Source depth & provenance

WhichPeps does not rely on a single headline study when the evidence base is broader. Primary research, registries, regulators and supporting records are kept distinct.

2structured study records
3outcome records
7linked source records

How to read these counts: they show evidence coverage, not evidence strength. One large, well-designed study can be more informative than several weak or indirect records.

Show supporting and discovery sources

Study pages above contain the records used for public evidence summaries. The links below include supporting, regulatory and literature-discovery sources; a registry or search result is not treated as proof of benefit.

Evidence rule: WhichPeps keeps human, animal, laboratory, regulatory and product/formulation evidence distinct. Common names help people find the page; they do not change the underlying scientific identity.