WhichPepsPeptides. Without the hype.

Omberacetam (Noopept)

Synthetic peptidomimetic / dipeptide-derived small molecule

Also known as: Noopept· common name
Post-stroke cognitive i…mild cognitive impairme…
Generic peptide vial illustrationOmberacetam (Noopept)
Entity typeSmall molecule
Evidence reviewed2026-09-18
Canonical recordNOOPEPT
Page updated2026-09-20
Evidence profileLimited older human clinical evidence; healthy cognitive enhancement unestablished
Human evidenceLimited
Regulatory statusNo FDA approval implied
Choose your depthStart simple, then open the evidence or technical detail only if you need it.
Quick answerPlain languageEvidenceOutcomes and studiesStudiesPrimary recordsTechnicalMechanism, route and identifiers

In plain English

30-second evidence answer

What does the evidence mean in simple terms?

Human studies exist, but they are small, limited, older, regional or mixed. The evidence is not strong enough for broad conclusions.

Still uncertain: Reliable benefit in healthy adults, long-term safety or a modern validated nootropic treatment regimen.

New to terms such as “preclinical”, “randomized” or “investigational”? Use the plain-English glossary →

What does the evidence mean in simple terms? table
What is it?Synthetic peptidomimetic / dipeptide-derived small molecule
Entity typeSmall molecule
Research focusPost-stroke cognitive impairment, mild cognitive impairment, neuroprotection; commonly discussed as a nootropic
Human evidenceHuman evidence consists mainly of older regional open/comparative studies in patients with vascular or traumatic cognitive impairment; no modern placebo-controlled healthy-adult cognitive-enhancement programme was identified.
Regulatory statusFDA substance records identify omberacetam/Noopept but explicitly note that UNII listing does not imply regulatory review or approval. Regulatory status varies internationally.
Main limitationsRobust efficacy in healthy adults, long-term safety or a modern validated nootropic treatment regimen.
SafetyNo large contemporary healthy-volunteer safety programme was identified; evidence gaps should be prominent.
Evidence reviewed2026-09-18
i
Human evidence consists mainly of older regional open/comparative studies in patients with vascular or traumatic cognitive impairment; no modern placebo-controlled healthy-adult cognitive-enhancement programme was identified.
Outcome-level evidence

Evidence is not one score.

Each record below answers a narrower question about an outcome, population or context. Evidence status and the study finding are shown separately so strong evidence is not mistaken for a positive effect.

How to read this →

Post-stroke cognitive impairment

Human evidence
Limited open human clinical evidence

Context: Stroke patients

Finding: Human signal exists in impaired patients.

Uncertainty / evidence gap: No modern large blinded placebo-controlled trial located in this pass; not tested as healthy enhancement.

Cognitive enhancement evidence quality

Human evidence
Limited unblinded/comparative human evidence

Context: Patients with vascular / post-traumatic cognitive impairment

Finding: Clinical signals are substantially weaker than the online 'smart drug' reputation implies.

Uncertainty / evidence gap: No good evidence establishes cognitive enhancement in healthy adults.

Evidence rule: an outcome-specific evidence label is not a recommendation, a safety rating or an overall score for the compound.

Evidence synthesis

  • ✓Human signal exists in impaired patients.
  • ✓Clinical signals are substantially weaker than the online 'smart drug' reputation implies.

Important limitations

  • !Open-label, older, single-country literature.
  • !Older Russian studies; limited blinding / registration / placebo control.

Selected study & evidence records

Noopept in mild cognitive impairment after stroke

2011 · Open prospective clinical study · n=60

MMSE and association tests improved relative to controls after two months.

Study detail → Primary source ↗

Clinical and EEG characteristics of Noopept in mild cognitive impairment of vascular or traumatic origin

2008 · Clinical study with EEG outcomes · n=Not stated in abstract

Noopept was associated with increased alpha/beta and reduced delta EEG power, interpreted as nonspecific activation/anxiolytic-type changes.

Study detail → Primary source ↗

Safety and unknowns

No large contemporary healthy-volunteer safety programme was identified; evidence gaps should be prominent.

Modern large randomized safety datasets are lacking. 'Widely used' or long market presence in some regions should not be mistaken for robust contemporary safety evidence.

Technical details

Mechanism / biologyMechanistic hypotheses include modulation of neurotrophin signalling, excitatory neurotransmission and oxidative/inflammatory pathways, but translation to human cognitive enhancement is uncertain.
Route / formulation boundaryMost clinical literature concerns oral use in neurologic patients; it should not be extrapolated to other formulations or healthy-user 'nootropic' protocols.
Identity / data-quality noteCorrectly classify as omberacetam/peptidomimetic rather than a conventional peptide.
Study / label regimen evidenceLimited human regimen identified. A 60-patient open prospective post-stroke study reported 20 mg/day for two months; this is not a healthy-person dosing recommendation.
Identifiers & alternate namesNoopept · GVS-111

Source depth & provenance

WhichPeps does not rely on a single headline study when the evidence base is broader. Primary research, registries, regulators and supporting records are kept distinct.

2structured study records
2outcome records
6linked source records

How to read these counts: they show evidence coverage, not evidence strength. One large, well-designed study can be more informative than several weak or indirect records.

Show supporting and discovery sources

Study pages above contain the records used for public evidence summaries. The links below include supporting, regulatory and literature-discovery sources; a registry or search result is not treated as proof of benefit.

Evidence rule: WhichPeps keeps human, animal, laboratory, regulatory and product/formulation evidence distinct. Common names help people find the page; they do not change the underlying scientific identity.