WhichPepsPeptides. Without the hype.

Zenagamtide

Unimolecular GLP-1, amylin and calcitonin receptor agonist peptide

Obesitytype 2 diabetes
Generic peptide vial illustrationZenagamtide
Entity typePeptide
Evidence reviewed2026-09-20
Canonical recordZENAGAMTIDE
Page updated2026-09-20
Evidence profilePeer-reviewed Phase II evidence; Phase 3 weight-management development underway
Human evidencePhase II published
Regulatory statusInvestigational / not authorised
Choose your depthStart simple, then open the evidence or technical detail only if you need it.
Quick answerPlain languageEvidenceOutcomes and studiesStudiesPrimary recordsTechnicalMechanism, route and identifiers

In plain English

30-second evidence answer

What does the evidence mean in simple terms?

Zenagamtide has controlled Phase 2 human trials showing effects on blood sugar and body weight. Phase 3 weight-management studies are now underway, but it remains investigational and is not an approved medicine.

Still uncertain: Marketing approval, long-term cardiovascular outcomes, rare-event safety and final therapeutic dosing.

New to terms such as “preclinical”, “randomized” or “investigational”? Use the plain-English glossary →

What does the evidence mean in simple terms? table
What is it?Unimolecular GLP-1, amylin and calcitonin receptor agonist peptide
Entity typePeptide
Research focusObesity, type 2 diabetes, sleep apnoea, knee osteoarthritis, heart failure
Human evidenceTwo peer-reviewed 2026 Phase II trials show significant HbA1c reductions with subcutaneous and oral zenagamtide in type 2 diabetes; Phase 3 weight-management development is underway.
Regulatory statusInvestigational; Phase 3 obesity programme initiated in 2026. No general marketing authorisation identified.
Main limitationsMarketing approval, long-term cardiovascular outcomes, rare-event safety or final therapeutic dosing.
SafetyGI tolerability is the main recurring signal; early-phase attrition and formulation differences must be visible.
Evidence reviewed2026-09-18
i
Two peer-reviewed 2026 Phase II trials show significant HbA1c reductions with subcutaneous and oral zenagamtide in type 2 diabetes; Phase 3 weight-management development is underway.
Outcome-level evidence

Evidence is not one score.

Each record below answers a narrower question about an outcome, population or context. Evidence status and the study finding are shown separately so strong evidence is not mistaken for a positive effect.

How to read this →

Weight loss

Human evidence
Early randomized human evidence

Context: Adults with overweight/obesity

Finding: Large early efficacy signal supports Phase 3 development.

Safety / tolerability context: High withdrawal/attrition and small study parts reduce certainty

Regulatory / scope context: no approved dosing or long-term outcomes.

HbA1c reduction with subcutaneous zenagamtide

Human evidence
Randomized Phase II human evidence

Context: Adults with type 2 diabetes

Finding: Meaningful glycaemic efficacy is demonstrated in Phase II.

Regulatory / scope context: No approval or long-term cardiovascular outcome evidence yet.

Verified 2026-09-18Primary source ↗

HbA1c reduction with oral zenagamtide

Human evidence
Randomized Phase II human evidence

Context: Adults with type 2 diabetes

Finding: Oral human efficacy is established at Phase II level.

Regulatory / scope context: Oral and subcutaneous formulations are not interchangeable and neither is approved.

Verified 2026-09-18Primary source ↗
Evidence rule: an outcome-specific evidence label is not a recommendation, a safety rating or an overall score for the compound.

Evidence synthesis

  • ✓Large early efficacy signal supports Phase 3 development.
  • ✓Meaningful glycaemic efficacy is demonstrated in Phase II.
  • ✓Oral human efficacy is established at Phase II level.

Important limitations

  • !Early phase, heterogeneous durations/doses; not suitable for direct efficacy ranking versus Phase 3 drugs.
  • !Dose-ranging trial; GI events common; longer-term Phase III confirmation needed.
  • !Dose-ranging trial; GI adverse events rose with higher doses.

Selected study & evidence records

Subcutaneous amycretin/zenagamtide Phase 1b/2a obesity study

2025 · Randomized controlled early-phase study · n=125

Estimated mean body-weight change included -24.3% at 60 mg vs -1.1% placebo at week 36; lower-dose groups also showed substantial loss.

Study detail → Primary source ↗

Once-weekly subcutaneous zenagamtide in type 2 diabetes

2026 · Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-finding trial · n=262

HbA1c change ranged from -0.9% at 0.4 mg to -1.7% at 40 mg; all active groups showed significant improvement versus placebo.

Study detail → Primary source ↗

Once-daily oral zenagamtide in type 2 diabetes

2026 · Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-finding trial · n=186

HbA1c fell by about 0.9%, 1.3% and 1.4% across the three active dose groups, significantly more than placebo.

Study detail → Primary source ↗

Safety and unknowns

GI tolerability is the main recurring signal; early-phase attrition and formulation differences must be visible.

Gastrointestinal events are frequent and mostly mild-to-moderate in early trials; early studies also had substantial participant withdrawal, requiring cautious interpretation.

Technical details

Mechanism / biologySingle peptide designed to combine GLP-1 receptor agonism with amylin/calcitonin-receptor-family activity affecting appetite, satiety and glucose regulation.
Route / formulation boundaryOral and subcutaneous regimens are formulation-specific and not interchangeable.
Identity / data-quality noteUse current name Zenagamtide and retain Amycretin as an alias for search continuity.
Study / label regimen evidenceEarly human dose-ranging verified; Phase 3 ongoing. Subcutaneous early-phase studies ranged from low single-mg doses to 60 mg weekly; later Phase 2 T2D studied 0.4–40 mg weekly. See study-specific records.
Identifiers & alternate namesAmycretin · former name amycretin

Source depth & provenance

WhichPeps does not rely on a single headline study when the evidence base is broader. Primary research, registries, regulators and supporting records are kept distinct.

3structured study records
3outcome records
6linked source records

How to read these counts: they show evidence coverage, not evidence strength. One large, well-designed study can be more informative than several weak or indirect records.

Show supporting and discovery sources

Study pages above contain the records used for public evidence summaries. The links below include supporting, regulatory and literature-discovery sources; a registry or search result is not treated as proof of benefit.

Evidence rule: WhichPeps keeps human, animal, laboratory, regulatory and product/formulation evidence distinct. Common names help people find the page; they do not change the underlying scientific identity.