WhichPeps

Thymosin alpha-1

28-amino-acid immunomodulatory peptide

Infectious diseaseimmunomodulation
Generic peptide vial illustrationThymosin alpha-1
Evidence levelLate-stage human
Human evidenceSubstantial
Regulatory statusSome non-U.S. approvals

What you need to know in 20 seconds

What is it?28-amino-acid immunomodulatory peptide
Research focusInfectious disease, immunomodulation, oncology adjunct research
Human evidenceHuman evidence is indication-dependent. Older sepsis studies/meta-analyses suggested benefit, but the 1,106-patient 2025 TESTS Phase III trial found no 28-day mortality benefit. Other older HBV and small COVID studies report indication-specific signals.
Regulatory statusThymalfasin/TA1 has been used/approved in some countries for selected indications, but no FDA approval; jurisdiction and product matter.
Main limitationsA broad immune-boosting or sepsis-survival benefit across populations; subgroup signals do not overturn the Phase III primary result.
SafetyFDA states compounded Ta1 may pose immunogenicity/impurity risk and that available safety information is inadequate for proposed compounded products.
i
Human evidence is indication-dependent. Older sepsis studies/meta-analyses suggested benefit, but the 1,106-patient 2025 TESTS Phase III trial found no 28-day mortality benefit. Other older HBV and small COVID studies report indication-specific signals.

What the evidence actually supports

  • The large null trial should be highly visible whenever thymosin alpha-1 is discussed for sepsis/immunomodulation.
  • This should outrank older small positive sepsis studies on the page.
  • Ideal example for the site's 'why evidence changed' module.
  • Historical disease-specific evidence, not a general immune-boosting claim.

What is not established / key limitations

  • ×No mortality benefit in the Phase III trial.
  • ×No overall mortality benefit; HR 0.99, P=0.93.
  • ×High-quality/multicenter subsets did not show a significant mortality benefit, consistent with the large TESTS trial.
  • ×The evidence predates modern nucleos(t)ide-analogue treatment standards.

Selected study & evidence records

TESTS Phase III thymosin alpha-1 sepsis trial

2025 · Randomized multicenter controlled trial · n=1106

Mortality was 23.4% versus 24.1% (HR≈0.99; P=.93): no mortality benefit.

Study detail → Primary source ↗

ETASS: thymosin alpha-1 for severe sepsis

2013 · Multicenter randomized controlled trial; single-blind · n=361

Mortality was 26.0% versus 35.0%; RR 0.74 (95% CI 0.54-1.02), with borderline/mixed significance depending on analysis; mHLA-DR improved.

Study detail → Primary source ↗

Thymosin alpha-1 versus interferon alpha for chronic hepatitis B: meta-analysis

2008 · Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials · n=199

At end of treatment, thymosin alpha-1 was not clearly superior; at 6-month post-treatment follow-up, pooled virological, biochemical and complete responses favored thymosin alpha-1.

Study detail → Primary source ↗

Safety and unknowns

FDA states compounded Ta1 may pose immunogenicity/impurity risk and that available safety information is inadequate for proposed compounded products.

Human exposure is substantial relative to many research peptides, but safety and benefit remain indication-specific. It is not FDA-approved, and compounded use raises additional quality/regulatory considerations.

Technical details

Mechanism / biologyModulates innate/adaptive immune signalling including T-cell and dendritic-cell functions.
Route / formulation boundaryDo not generalize outcomes across hepatitis, sepsis, cancer, COVID-19 or wellness indications.
Identity / data-quality noteUse the canonical compound identity and studied formulation when interpreting evidence.
Dosing evidence statusVerified dosing evidence added. Published human clinical-use regimen. See dosing_evidence records for route, regimen, population, duration and source.
Identifiers & alternate namesTA1 · Thymalfasin · Thymosin alpha 1

Evidence rule: WhichPeps keeps human, animal, laboratory, regulatory and product/formulation evidence distinct. Common names help people find the page; they do not change the underlying scientific identity.