WhichPepsPeptides. Without the hype.

Pemvidutide

Dual GLP-1 receptor / glucagon receptor agonist peptide

ObesityMASLD
Generic peptide vial illustrationPemvidutide
Entity typePeptide
Evidence reviewed2026-09-20
Canonical recordPEMVIDUTIDE
Page updated2026-09-20
Evidence profilePhase 3 MASH development underway; investigational
Human evidencePhase II published
Regulatory statusInvestigational / not authorised
Choose your depthStart simple, then open the evidence or technical detail only if you need it.
Quick answerPlain languageEvidenceOutcomes and studiesStudiesPrimary recordsTechnicalMechanism, route and identifiers

In plain English

30-second evidence answer

What does the evidence mean in simple terms?

Pemvidutide has controlled human studies in obesity and serious fatty-liver disease (MASH). A global Phase 3 MASH programme is now active, but pemvidutide remains investigational and is not an approved medicine.

Still uncertain: Marketing approval, long-term liver outcomes, definitive fibrosis benefit, cardiovascular outcomes and routine-use dosing.

New to terms such as “preclinical”, “randomized” or “investigational”? Use the plain-English glossary →

What does the evidence mean in simple terms? table
What is it?Dual GLP-1 receptor / glucagon receptor agonist peptide
Entity typePeptide
Research focusObesity, MASLD, MASH, alcohol-related liver disease, cardiometabolic risk
Human evidenceRandomized Phase 2 obesity and MASH studies show weight-loss, liver-fat and MASH-resolution signals. The global PERFORMA Phase 3 MASH programme is active; pemvidutide remains investigational.
Regulatory statusInvestigational. FDA granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation for MASH based on early clinical evidence; this is not marketing approval.
Main limitationsMarketing approval, long-term liver outcomes, definitive fibrosis benefit, cardiovascular outcomes and routine-use dosing are not established.
SafetyGI tolerability and liver-disease population safety are being characterised; longer-term and rare-event data remain limited.
Evidence reviewed2026-09-18
i
Randomized Phase 2 obesity and MASH studies show weight-loss, liver-fat and MASH-resolution signals. The global PERFORMA Phase 3 MASH programme is active; pemvidutide remains investigational.
Outcome-level evidence

Evidence is not one score.

Each record below answers a narrower question about an outcome, population or context. Evidence status and the study finding are shown separately so strong evidence is not mistaken for a positive effect.

How to read this →

Weight loss

Human evidence
Phase 2 human evidence (conference-level full obesity result)

Context: Adults with obesity/overweight

Finding: Clinically meaningful Phase 2 weight-loss signal.

Uncertainty / evidence gap: Primary obesity result is conference publication rather than full peer-reviewed journal paper in the reviewed source set.

Verified 2026-09-18Primary source ↗

MASH resolution / fibrosis

Human evidence
Randomized Phase 2b human evidence

Context: Biopsy-confirmed F2/F3 MASH

Finding: MASH resolution primary endpoint met.

Counter-evidence / null result: Fibrosis improvement without worsening MASH was 33%/36% vs 28% and not statistically significant.

Evidence rule: an outcome-specific evidence label is not a recommendation, a safety rating or an overall score for the compound.

Evidence synthesis

  • ✓Clinically meaningful Phase 2 weight-loss signal.
  • ✓MASH resolution primary endpoint met.

Important limitations

  • !Phase 2; programme emphasis now includes liver disease; no approval.
  • !24-week histology; longer duration needed for fibrosis; Phase 3 pending.

Selected study & evidence records

MOMENTUM: Pemvidutide Phase 2 obesity trial

2024 · Randomized, placebo-controlled trial · n=391

Mean loss 10.3%, 11.2%, 15.6% vs 2.2% placebo; at 2.4 mg, 51.8% achieved ≥15% and 32.1% ≥20% weight loss.

Study detail → Primary source ↗

IMPACT Phase 2b trial in MASH

2025 · Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial · n=212

MASH resolution 58% and 52% vs 20% placebo; fibrosis improvement 33% and 36% vs 28% placebo and was not statistically significant.

Study detail → Primary source ↗

Safety and unknowns

GI tolerability and liver-disease population safety are being characterised; longer-term and rare-event data remain limited.

Adverse events are common but mostly mild-to-moderate in reported trials; gastrointestinal tolerability remains important. Fibrosis benefit was not statistically significant at 24 weeks in the Phase 2b IMPACT primary fibrosis endpoint.

Technical details

Mechanism / biologyBalanced GLP-1/glucagon receptor agonism aims to reduce appetite and body weight while increasing hepatic fat oxidation and improving metabolic liver disease.
Route / formulation boundaryTrial-grade once-weekly subcutaneous product; Breakthrough Therapy designation must not be presented as FDA approval.
Identity / data-quality noteSeparate obesity, MASLD and biopsy-confirmed MASH endpoints; do not treat Breakthrough Therapy as approval.
Study / label regimen evidenceMultiple Phase 2 human regimens verified. MOMENTUM studied 1.2, 1.8 and 2.4 mg weekly for 48 weeks; IMPACT studied 1.2 and 1.8 mg weekly without titration.
Identifiers & alternate namesALT-801

Source depth & provenance

WhichPeps does not rely on a single headline study when the evidence base is broader. Primary research, registries, regulators and supporting records are kept distinct.

2structured study records
2outcome records
5linked source records

How to read these counts: they show evidence coverage, not evidence strength. One large, well-designed study can be more informative than several weak or indirect records.

Show supporting and discovery sources

Study pages above contain the records used for public evidence summaries. The links below include supporting, regulatory and literature-discovery sources; a registry or search result is not treated as proof of benefit.

Evidence rule: WhichPeps keeps human, animal, laboratory, regulatory and product/formulation evidence distinct. Common names help people find the page; they do not change the underlying scientific identity.