WhichPepsPeptides. Without the hype.

Maridebart cafraglutide

Long-acting antibody–peptide conjugate: GLP-1 receptor agonist / GIP receptor antagonist

Obesitytype 2 diabetes
Generic peptide vial illustrationMaridebart cafraglutide
Entity typeProtein / growth-factor-related biologic
Evidence reviewed2026-09-20
Canonical recordMARITIDE
Page updated2026-09-20
Evidence profilePublished Phase II evidence; multiple Phase 3 programmes underway; investigational
Human evidencePhase II published
Regulatory statusInvestigational / not authorised
Choose your depthStart simple, then open the evidence or technical detail only if you need it.
Quick answerPlain languageEvidenceOutcomes and studiesStudiesPrimary recordsTechnicalMechanism, route and identifiers

In plain English

30-second evidence answer

What does the evidence mean in simple terms?

Maridebart cafraglutide (MariTide) has early human Phase 1 evidence and a larger controlled Phase 2 obesity trial showing substantial weight loss. Multiple Phase 3 programmes are now underway, but it remains investigational.

Still uncertain: Marketing approval, Phase 3 treatment results, long-term cardiovascular outcomes, rare-event safety and real-world effectiveness.

New to terms such as “preclinical”, “randomized” or “investigational”? Use the plain-English glossary →

What does the evidence mean in simple terms? table
What is it?Long-acting antibody–peptide conjugate: GLP-1 receptor agonist / GIP receptor antagonist
Entity typeProtein / growth-factor-related biologic
Research focusObesity, type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular outcomes
Human evidenceA first-in-human Phase 1 study established early safety/PK/PD and exploratory weight-loss signals, followed by a larger randomized Phase 2 obesity trial showing substantial weight loss including in participants with type 2 diabetes.
Regulatory statusInvestigational; Phase 3 chronic-weight-management and cardiovascular studies are underway. No marketing authorisation identified.
Main limitationsMarketing approval, long-term cardiovascular outcomes, rare-event safety or real-world effectiveness.
SafetyGI adverse effects were common; escalation reduced tolerability burden in Phase 2.
Evidence reviewed2026-09-20
i
Published Phase 1 and randomized Phase 2 evidence show substantial weight-loss signals, and multiple MARITIME Phase 3 programmes are now underway. MariTide remains investigational.
Outcome-level evidence

Evidence is not one score.

Each record below answers a narrower question about an outcome, population or context. Evidence status and the study finding are shown separately so strong evidence is not mistaken for a positive effect.

How to read this →

Weight loss

Human evidence
Randomized Phase 2 human evidence

Context: Adults with obesity ± type 2 diabetes

Finding: Substantial Phase 2 efficacy with monthly/less-frequent dosing concept.

Safety / tolerability context: GI adverse events common; Phase 3 outcomes and long-term safety pending.

Weight and HbA1c in obesity with type 2 diabetes

Human evidence
Randomized Phase II human evidence

Context: Adults with obesity and T2D

Finding: Both weight and glycaemic signals are substantial.

Regulatory / scope context: No marketing approval or long-term outcome evidence yet.

Verified 2026-09-18Primary source ↗

GI tolerability and dose escalation

Human evidence
Randomized Phase II safety/tolerability evidence

Context: Adults with obesity

Finding: Regimen design materially affects tolerability.

Safety / tolerability context: No evidence that less-frequent dosing eliminates class-related GI adverse effects.

Verified 2026-09-18Primary source ↗
Evidence rule: an outcome-specific evidence label is not a recommendation, a safety rating or an overall score for the compound.

Evidence synthesis

  • ✓Substantial Phase 2 efficacy with monthly/less-frequent dosing concept.
  • ✓Both weight and glycaemic signals are substantial.
  • ✓Regimen design materially affects tolerability.

Important limitations

  • !Multiple dose/escalation arms make simplistic 'monthly dose' summaries misleading.
  • !Phase II and antibody-peptide conjugate formulation.
  • !Phase II sample and duration limit rare-event assessment.

Selected study & evidence records

Phase 1 AMG 133 (maridebart cafraglutide) single- and multiple-ascending-dose study in obesity

2024 · Phase 1 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled single- and multiple-ascending-dose study · n=110 enrolled in registry; 75 in published principal SAD/MAD cohorts

The publication reported acceptable safety/tolerability and dose-dependent weight loss; in multiple-ascending-dose cohorts, weight loss was maintained for up to 150 days after the last dose.

Study detail → Primary source ↗

Once-Monthly Maridebart Cafraglutide for the Treatment of Obesity — Phase 2

2025 · Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled dose-ranging trial · n=592

Obesity cohort mean change ranged -12.3% to -16.2% vs -2.5%; obesity+T2D -8.4% to -12.3% vs -1.7%.

Study detail → Primary source ↗

Safety and unknowns

GI adverse effects were common; escalation reduced tolerability burden in Phase 2.

Gastrointestinal adverse events were common in Phase 2, with better tolerability when dose escalation and lower starting doses were used. Long-term rare-event safety remains under study.

Technical details

Mechanism / biologyCombines GLP-1 receptor agonism with GIP receptor antagonism in a long-acting antibody-peptide conjugate intended for monthly or less-frequent dosing.
Route / formulation boundaryMaridebart cafraglutide is a long-acting antibody-peptide conjugate, not a conventional peptide vial.
Identity / data-quality noteAvoid calling MariTide simply a peptide; it is an antibody-peptide conjugate.
Study / label regimen evidencePhase 2 dose-ranging verified. Phase 2 studied 140, 280 or 420 mg every 4 weeks and a 420 mg every-8-week arm, with different escalation schedules.
Identifiers & alternate namesMariTide · AMG 133

Source depth & provenance

WhichPeps does not rely on a single headline study when the evidence base is broader. Primary research, registries, regulators and supporting records are kept distinct.

2structured study records
3outcome records
6linked source records

How to read these counts: they show evidence coverage, not evidence strength. One large, well-designed study can be more informative than several weak or indirect records.

Show supporting and discovery sources

Study pages above contain the records used for public evidence summaries. The links below include supporting, regulatory and literature-discovery sources; a registry or search result is not treated as proof of benefit.

Evidence rule: WhichPeps keeps human, animal, laboratory, regulatory and product/formulation evidence distinct. Common names help people find the page; they do not change the underlying scientific identity.